HomeUncategorizedSorry Joe
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ghostsniper
ghostsniper
1 month ago

Yeah, that passport thing was a bridge too far. No normal human being can get over that one and abnormal human beings get no say at all.

When you think about it, it’s downright laughable that they would even try something like that.

But they did.

And that should tell you something else.

The brazen audacity.

george
Tom Hyland
Tom Hyland
1 month ago
Reply to  ghostsniper

Autos burned ten blocks away. Actually the engines melted into pools of molten steel but the rest of the car was okay. Nothing to see here folks, just move along. Here’s a very brief video that played only once and never again. If it’s taken Cenk Uyger 25 years to scratch his head but now he’s wondering? Fuck that guy.
https://substack.com/@asitis28/note/c-205096956?r=2eq88f

Joe
Joe
1 month ago
Reply to  DT

America is being destroyed, one drop at a time.

Here is a short one from World Net Daily. “Just weeks ago, New York City residents, including large populations of immigrants, elected a Muslim, Zohran Mamdani, the city’s new mayor.
He immediately praised his own religion as the one true faith, and now there are being broadcast into city streets, in multiple locations, the Islamic call to prayer, up to five times a day.
Actor James Woods, who commentary attracts as much attention these days as his other life accomplishments, pointed out, “Well, that didn’t take long…”

Tom Hyland
Tom Hyland
1 month ago
Reply to  DT

Why do you write the word “dot” into offered links thus making it a chore to access? Saying what happened or didn’t happen? The point here is to be fully aware of all of it. The “who” appears to be more obvious than ever.

DT
DT
1 month ago
Reply to  Tom Hyland

“Why do you write the word “dot” into offered links”
Because I prefer to not put live links on the front page. If a reader feels the article is worth exploring, it shouldn’t be a problem to make the link live.

Tom Hyland
Tom Hyland
1 month ago
Reply to  DT

It IS a problem. I tried a couple of times and never was able to insert the proper configuration for it to open to another website or read whatever this was.

DT
DT
1 month ago
Reply to  Tom Hyland

Here’s an example: you entered a link to substack.com. I would put that on a post as substack dot com. Put the two words together with a period (dot) in between.

Tom Hyland
Tom Hyland
1 month ago
Reply to  DT

Why do you prefer to not place a live link? If you thought the story was interesting enough to mention and worthy of exploration why make it a hassle to get there? I doubt I’m the only visitor to your website experiencing the same.

Last edited 1 month ago by Tom Hyland
ghostsniper
ghostsniper
1 month ago
Reply to  Tom Hyland

Thanks for that link Tom.
I was scrolling down below and came upon the attached graphic.
It confirms something I thought was lost.

A year before 9-11 I saw a half hour video in a Usenet Group of a group of Swedish workers in the towers wiring what was claimed to be a new security system. There were at least 30 workers in the vid and I saw boxes of things that aren’t normally associated with security systems. I was a demolition specialist in the army and some of the boxes in the vid has nomenclature for various demolition parts. Further, I saw them running det cord and electrical and non-electrical fusing.

I didn’t take the vid seriously at the time and didn’t save it to a hard drive. I wish I had. I’ve searched for that vid in vain many times, figuring it was probably scrubbed. I now, 25 years later I see a pic of a screencap of that vid. I would still like to have that vid in my possession. The towers were wired in advance and the proof is out there.

911-tower-rigging
Joe
Joe
1 month ago
Reply to  ghostsniper

Ghostsniper, I am of the firm opinion that the whole scenario was orchestrated by our government in conjunction with the Israelis. Tens of millions of other Americans along with some big named people believe this to be true.

Tom Hyland
Tom Hyland
1 month ago
Reply to  Joe

“Sarah, if the American people knew the truth about what we Bushes have done to the nation, we would be chased down the street and lynched.” 
    – George H.W. Bush to Sarah McClendon, Dec. 1992

“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” – William Casey CIA Director 1981

We will know the ultimate program is complete when the United States of America is renamed West Israel.

Tom Hyland
Tom Hyland
1 month ago
Reply to  ghostsniper

I saw that video too, long ago. I recall these Israeli “students” explaining they were installing an art project. Gotta admit for the pyrotechnics it was even better than they could have planned. They received an A+ and America was sent to the detention hall.

azlibertarian
azlibertarian
1 month ago

With all respect to my friends here, I have pretty close to zero problems with the official explanation of the 9/11 attack. We saw those planes hit those buildings; We heard the “Let’s roll” phone call. Am I happy about how the Department of Homeland Security was created? Not entirely, but it isn’t all bad either. Do I like the Patriot Act? Mmyeah, I wish that they had looked at another way to accomplish it’s aims.

But I think that Cent Ugyur with his passports is very much like Rosie O’Donnell with her claim that “Fire can’t melt steel”. They, and those like them, wear their tinfoil hats far too tightly.

But with respect to this…

“…For one thing, given the time and place, it seems not enough people died….”

…I agree, and I think that on this point, the UBL-led, al Qaeda attack on America and the West might be seen as a failure. Far too few were killed.

In one view, the attack should be seen as a spectacular success. They turned 3 out of 4 of our own airplanes into de facto Weapons-of-Mass-Destruction killing thousands and doing tens of billions of dollars of damage. The attack brought a superpower to it’s knees.

But they only killed 3000. We were all expecting 10,000. Why was it only 3000?

I think that there is a simple two-fold explanation.

  • Time. They struck the Towers too early. The North Tower was struck at 8:46am and the South Tower was struck at 9:03am. Had they waited an hour later, there would have been more people in those buildings.
  • Place. The Towers were each 110 stories tall. The plane which struck the North Tower struck between the 94th and 98th floors. The plane which struck the South Tower struck between the 78th and 84th floors. Had they stuck those buildings lower, more people would have been trapped on floors above the damaged areas.
Mark
Mark
1 month ago
Reply to  azlibertarian

AZ, Three towers came down—-completely. Remember when Silverstein made the following comment “I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”
How could they have “rigged” the building in a few hours to cause a controlled collapse. It is impossible.

Also, all the stories about cell phone calls. Totally impossible. Not only did we not have cellular network capable of communications with cellphones on aircraft but the antennae used on the cell towers were “down tilted”.  

What Tom Hyland said is 100% verifiable. To make matters worse many of the individuals if not most who were participants in this coverup are American citizens. They sold America out —-for what? They sold out the greatest nation in the existence of humankind, for what???????

azlibertarian
azlibertarian
1 month ago
Reply to  Mark

“….Also, all the stories about cell phone calls. Totally impossible….”

I am a retired airline pilot and back in 2001, my airline had phones in the back of each seat. If a passenger needed to make a call, they could reach out no further than right in front of their faces, swipe their credit card and place a phone call. There are recordings of these calls being made.

Google AI…

At least 45 known phone calls were placed from the four hijacked 9/11 flights, with the vast majority (37) occurring on United Flight 93. Passengers and crew used onboard Airfones and personal cell phones to contact family and authorities between 9:28 a.m. and 10:03 a.m.

Mark
Mark
1 month ago
Reply to  azlibertarian

The “PHONES” you speak of were not cell phones. One cell phone, if used from an airplane/jet could shut down a whole cellular system for hundreds of miles. Not only that they could have potentially caused severe problems with the jets electronics systems. What you had was based on low power 450 MHz and when making a call the callers own personal cellphone number (560)555-1212 or such did not show up on caller id. It could not have. As far as Shanksville there was a military jet circling as the so called jet crashed. Nothing was left of the downed craft even though it flew over, on a flat trajectory, a building not 5,000 feet from where it crashed. Whatever the things was, it had lost its jet engine approximately 8 miles to the north.(many speculate that it was shot down). The building it flew over was used for scrap metals. The employees saw what happened. The field where it crashed was an old coal strip mine. The owner of the field and owner of the scrap business had left the US years before because of the Vietnam war. Had gone to Australia. After the war he came back and started the business. The local congress critter tried to get him to donate the land and he said no–when he finished bargaining he did very well for himself. I believe that if it has not been scrubbed from the net you will find that the supposed jet that came down was actually sitting on the runway up in Cleveland when the supposed crash took place, passengers and all. If it wasn’t the same plane it should not have had the same tail numbers.

azlibertarian
azlibertarian
1 month ago
Reply to  Mark

“The “PHONES” you speak of were not cell phones. One cell phone, if used from an airplane/jet could shut down a whole cellular system for hundreds of miles. Not only that they could have potentially caused severe problems with the jets electronics systems….”

Dude. Step away from the intellectual cliff you are on and take a few deep breaths.

Who said “CELL” phone? Hint: It wasn’t me. The system I was referring to was from a company called Airfone. It was very similar to the cellphones that we have come to know and love, but a completely independent system.

azlibertarian
azlibertarian
1 month ago
Reply to  Mark

“…Three towers came down—-completely….”

Right. Is it really that hard to imagine that when the 2 tallest buildings in NYC (again, each at 110 floors) collapse, that the debris from their collapse might not damage a neighboring building to the point that it too would collapse?

“…How could they have “rigged” the building in a few hours to cause a controlled collapse. It is impossible….”

Are you asking me this question? I ask because if you are, this has never been my claim. I do not believe that WTC1, WTC2 or Building 7 were “rigged” to collapse.



Tom Hyland
Tom Hyland
1 month ago
Reply to  azlibertarian

Did you hear “Let’s Roll”? Really? From 33,000 feet up? There were phone calls from “up there” that were so preposterous, so mechanical such as, “Hello mom… this is your son, Roger. I’m hijacked… etc.” Anyone who uses the phrase “tin foil hat” probably utilizes the “conspiracy theory” tagline. Jet fuel, basically kerosene, doesn’t melt steel and a Boeing 757 can’t fit through a 16′ diameter hole. There was nothing in Shanksville but airplane parts tossed around, luggage, passports and no airplane. No bodies. Rescue crews declared it wasn’t a plane wreck. You’re the best kind of American… believing what you’re told.

Tom Hyland
Tom Hyland
1 month ago

I stop by here very seldom and have a look but it’s usually more photos of erosion, and I can see that up close and personal if I gaze in the mirror. I don’t believe anything I’m told, unless after calm consideration, and it’s the easiest way to navigate life. Nothing about 9/11, officially, made a lick of sense. Sorry AZ, but your phone call tech report doesn’t account for surreal phone calls from people reading a script sounding like government agents. The phone calls aren’t going to erase the mountain of weirdness in every other direction. Apparently you’ll never face the reality that building no. 3 was pulled, and there were no plane wrecks at the Pentagon or Shanksville. This is a 16 minute video with jewish scholar Jana Ben-Nun describing the basic tenets of their beliefs and prophesy and I ain’t in the big club, as George Carlin used to say. Donald Trump is! Annihilation of those not recognized as human is their game plan. The Big Club owns and delivers the news. It’s the same big club they use to beat you over the head and tell you what to believe, who your heroes are, and you better get vaccinated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz-to_FcL0o&t=66s

azlibertarian
azlibertarian
1 month ago
Reply to  Tom Hyland

“…there were no plane wrecks at the Pentagon….”

WTF are you talking about?

Here is a picture of airplane parts pulled from the Pentagon. There are more here at this Source.

EPA-pentagon-attack4-ml-170331_3x2_992
Tom Hyland
Tom Hyland
1 month ago
Reply to  azlibertarian

Your source showed several photos of the 16′ diameter hole from inside the building and out, that’s before the central area collapsed from the roof down. No impact of wings each side of the 16′ hole. Maybe somewhere, I don’t know where, there were photos taken of crumpled fuselage. The same thing happened in Shanksville. Airplane parts were tossed around. If you look at the side of the Pentagon that was struck and view the close proximity of the Boundary Channel of the Potomac it was likely a surface-to-air missile launched from a ship. Hundreds of cameras everywhere but not one believable photographed sequence except a one frame bright flash. I believe nothing they told us.

azlibertarian
azlibertarian
1 month ago
Reply to  Tom Hyland

So, your point is that hundreds of cameras in the area only managed to capture one believable frame of American 77 on it’s way to the Pentagon. Do I have that right?

Question: Why didn’t those hundreds of cameras capture that surface-to-air missile you claim was launched from a ship?

And not just a missile launched from a ship. No. This ship would be located somewhere near the Boundary Channel of the Potomac River. That’s your claim, right….”…close proximity of the Boundary Channel of the Potomac….”?

AYFKM, Tom?

Take a look at the map I have attached. I grabbed that from Wikipedia. That blue marker is the Boundary Channel. Standing on that marker, I could spit as far as the Pentagon (due south). Washington Reagan is just southeast where the Potomac turns to the south. Probably throw a rock that far. Turn to the northeast and you can see where the White House is located. Slingshot range. The CIA is upstream off the left edge of the map and Congress is just off the right edge of the map.

From this location, you claim that it was “likely [that] a surface-to-air missile was launched from a ship“.

Incredible.

Screenshot_20260218-181840_Chrome
Tom Hyland
Tom Hyland
1 month ago
Reply to  azlibertarian

There were hundreds of cameras all over the place. This could possibly be the most camera-intensive place on planet Earth. Only one photo-still of a bright flash was offered to consider because every camera upload everywhere was confiscated. I recall a gas station owner telling how his location was instantly swarming with agents and they absconded with his entire system. That’s all you got, one photo, one bright flash. Did you see a jet airliner fly into the Pentagon. No, you didn’t.

Tom Hyland
Tom Hyland
1 month ago

Mark Dice chimed in today to express his pity for the clueless Cenk Uyger who groveled for 25 years before the “official story” but now is suddenly thinking stuff don’t add up. Several more moments are included in this compilation of uncomfortable lies revealed. This is how I post a link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkH8ROqq3DQ

DT
DT
1 month ago
Reply to  Tom Hyland

You’re free to post a live link in comments. I don’t want them on the main page.

I post articles and photos that my muse suggests I post. I do believe it was you that suggested posting more abandoned buildings. I find abandoned buildings fascinating – especially those out in “nowhere” so there will be more of “what was?” to spark someone’s imagination – even if just mine. A town of 100 years ago that once held thousands of people that no longer exists but for skeletons of remnants lost in the sage or sometimes not even that. I have a post coming sometime showing an example of just that.

You have enough comments, I’d truly like you to submit something suitable for a post – speak your mind. ghost and jean are fairly prolific writers, you can join them. I will edit live links but not remove them. I reserve the right to not post an article – stuff on tranzies will not be posted unless I initiate it for some reason. I also reserve the right to screw up every once in a while.

The main criteria for a post is that it be something Gerard would approve. I’ve only killed one article and the author agreed with my decision.

ghostsniper
ghostsniper
1 month ago

Can we tone it back a bit?
We’re all friends here.

I think we all believe the gov’t-media complex has been lying to us for a very long time.

We all wear tin hats to some degree.

We’ve all done research and have come to the conclusions we have, and we all will readjust our conclusions as new information warrants.

Pistol whipping each other doesn’t improve anything.

================

DT’s method of posting links is a little irritating and I’ve had problems accessing some. His house, his rules, I won’t complain too much.

DT’s posting material. I appreciate it for what it is and sometimes I comment on it. It’s not 100% my cuppa but it’s unique, something you don’t see everyday. It’s not my place to complain in his house.

This isn’t the only site I ever visit but I do visit here everyday because I get along with the regulars and enjoy the occasional tidbit that may happen. And sometimes I offer things that interest me.

The way things are going in general I foresee the day when the internet at large just won’t work for me any more. I see widening cracks everyday.

Technology is the god of deception and the only reason you don’t realize this (yet) is that it is very successful.

Today is our 42nd anniversary and we did a lunch at a messican joint and at 4pm I am still stuffed to the gills. The temp here right now is 73 degrees (way too hot!) and the sun is shining. At 6pm my wife and I are going to sit on the front porch for the first time in months. She will be sipping some little silly alcoholic beverage she purchased and I will be sucking down a few PBR tall boys (on sale) while we watch the birds and wildlife in the yard. I doubt I’ll eat any supper. Maybe a couple crackers and peanut butter if anything.

Today has been a good day.

Oh yeah, for our anniversary I bought my wife a 12′ tall vintage windmill for in her flower garden and I will assemble it over the next few days, and I also bought her a giant box of milk chocolate covered cherries – yeah, the Queen Anne variety. She’s as happy as a clam and that’s always a good thing here on the Ghost Compound.

animals
GrayDog
GrayDog
1 month ago
Reply to  ghostsniper

42 years. Wow. Congratulations Ghost and Mrs Ghost!

jean
jean
1 month ago
Reply to  ghostsniper

Happy Anniversary to Ghost and Mrs. Ghost 🙂

G706
G706
1 month ago
Reply to  ghostsniper

Happy Anniversary! Your Queen and mine seem to have similar tastes in drinks, PBR on sale is a good choice.

Joe
Joe
1 month ago
Reply to  ghostsniper

Ghostsniper, May you and your bride have many more! Tempus fugit

SK
SK
1 month ago

Reasonable minds can disagree, gentlemen.
Law school teaches that reasonableness has a wide range. Unreasonableness runs along the edges of that range. Hence the guilty beyond reasonable doubt standard.
We all analyze facts and situations differently depending on our brains, background and experience. Looking at the same facts we can each reasonably draw different conclusions.
And of course if we look at different facts we will almost certainly come to different conclusions.
The great difficulty today is sorting fact from fiction, truth from lies; it is a problem that will only worsen with the advent of AI.
Separating fact from fiction is what you all are arguing about here and I’m not sure how anyone can do that with confidence or certainty on a topic as complex and fraught as 9/11.

ghostsniper
ghostsniper
1 month ago

Thanks ya’ll!
It gets easier the farther you go.

Now, for something completely different.
We got married in1984 and my wife wanted to go back to her home in Shelbyville, IN for Christmas that year and show me off LOL. So we rented a brand new Ford LTD and set off.

I drove all night non stop and the radio played Don Henley’s “Boys Of Summer” almost constantly. The signal would fade out and I’d find a new station and soon enough Boys Of Summer would be playing again. Over and over. Thus, I learned the lyrics.

Wouldn’t you know it that 30 years later I found out I had remembered a part of the lyrics wrong.

I thought he said, “…my love for you is 10 feet tall.”

What he really said was, “…my love for you would still be strong.”

Mine was NOW, his was in the past.

I like my version better.

Try it yourself and see:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RUIeX6UCT8&list=RD6RUIeX6UCT8&start_radio=1

2-13-57