Judges
I can understand a “judge” blocking Executive branch actions, but that judge should be the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. It is the Supreme Court that is on equal level with the Executive Branch, not all these piddling regional district courts.
Too many judges have come to the conclusion they have more power than they should. And too many have come to the conclusion they represent the Legislative branch as well.
Just my thought for the day (of many that may not see the light of digital bits).
I’ve thought it strange that a lowly judge out there somewhere is capable of blocking the President. By what right?
It’s just part of the ongoing dissolution of the Republic. The Federal Judiciary has a cancer of partisanship and it’s far along, it will be fatal, but excising it now will be painful and dangerous and crippling.
One major cause I see is that the judiciary is unsupervised. No Judge, from the lowliest magistrate to SCOTUS suffers any consequences for getting it wrong or ruling based on their partisan preferences. Everybody has to have a boss and be disciplined. FedJudges think they are all Madison’s angels, thus they never criticize or discipline each other. Except for that one 98-year old Lady Judge they are trying to get rid of so they can get another partisan installed. And so they are all, all of them, sloppy in their decisions. Look at those last four installed in the Supreme Court. Touted as paragons of judicial temperament, the crème of the Judges, and faithful to the Constitution, they turn out to be undependable thin reeds bending in the slightest breeze, midwits.
Congress is supposed to make the rules for the Judiciary. And those rules should include robust mechanisms for disciplining and regulating the Judges. But the filthy Congresscritter scum, they like the Judiciary just the way it is: corrupt and partisan.
Everybody in this country knows the Judges are biased and political. Lots of people won’t admit it out loud, but everybody knows it.
Another contributing cause is the current operating regime: the process is the punishment, i.e. lawfare, who cares what the innocence or guilt is, torture the partisan target until he’s ruined. They all agree: Congress and Judiciary, this is how they want it done, they like it this way, it serves their politics well.
Well, the Chief Justice of SCOTUS is on the record as proclaiming all FedJudges have sterling rectitude and fidelity to the Constitution, they all work very hard, and are not to be criticized. He’s whistling past the graveyard, he’s the little Dutch boy attempting to hold back the flood, or he’s a naif, or a coward. He’s the head of the rotting fish, the bad leader who refuses to lead because somebody somewhere might criticize him. He deserves all the scorn that can be heaped upon him.
And T, himself a many-time victim of the FedJudiciary, he’s not going to be the fool that sends his wobbling hand back to the fire.
And thus the Republic perishes through cowardice and corruption of lesser men.
The gov’t that governs the least governs the best, as they say, and I agree. Frankly, I’ve never needed it (gov’t) or wanted it and have always thought of it as a sort of “prison” enacted before I was born. There’s a thick, cast iron Libertarian core running right through my very center.
Here in MT ALL of our state judges are so biased is disgusting. The state constitution says they have to run as independent–but all you have to do is look at the way they have handled the DEI/Gay rights/Socialist agenda cases and you can see how truly biased they are. They believe to be “amont the enlightened”. They think they are the lead “agents of change” that will guide the young communists into creating a better world for all. As I speak we are trying to get a new law that would require them to declare a party–but I doubt we can pass that one. We have seven R legislators voting a straight D ticket–interesting isn’t it?
As you judge so will you be judged, and the measure in which you measure, will be measured out on you. Matthew 7:2