Hey, Mr. Tambourine Man,
play a song for me
I'm not sleepy
and there ain't no place I'm goin' to
Hey, Mr. Tambourine Man,
play a song for me
In the jingle jangle morning,
I'll come followin' you
Take me for a trip upon
your magic swirling ship
All my senses have been stripped
And my hands can't feel to grip
And my toes too numb to step
Wait only for my boot heels to be wanderin'
I'm ready to go anywhere,
I'm ready for to fade
Unto my own parade
Cast your dancing spell my way
I promise to go under it
This one goes in that box over in the corner marked, “Unknown”.
About 50 years ago that box was small, matchbox size.
But every 10 years or so I revaluate and install a bigger box.
Now, that box is as big as a 1 car garage.
I suspect AI is going increase that box size til it’s as big as Stuttgart.
No doubt about what?
I think DT is saying he has no doubt that we went there. I’m in the category of those who believed it for a really long time, until I got a computer around 2000 and was confronted by alternative information. Now I’m convinced we never went there. “I have certain rules that I live by. My first rule: I don’t believe anything the government tells me. Nothing. Zero.” – George Carlin
https://beforeitsnews.com/eu/2021/10/the-moon-landing-hoax-must-see-video-2677728.html
Jeez, what a CF.
Here’s my thought: the technology wasn’t good enough for such effects in 1969, the number of people necessary to be in on the plot would be large and I doubt that none would have told – with legit evidence – after all this time, and NASA is not able to keep a secret for this long … if for no other reason than to brag about how well their demonstration worked.
Now – if such happened today with the current state of compute and graphics power, I would have doubts. Having been in the field more or less since the ’70s, I’d have to say the quality of engineering was far better then than now – then it was “can we and how good” and technical people ran the companies; now it’s “how soon and how cheap” with accountants and lawyers running companies.
A longer story than for now but I had a direct it-was-me story of the differences between 2015 and 1985 engineering quality. Summary of the 2015 vs 1985: “We don’t go down to that level”.
CAE used to be an engineering aid, now it’s an engineering oracle. Even in 1985, a computer analysis was verified by hand analysis. Now? If the computer says it’s so, it’s the word of God brought down the mountain and none may question.
Regarding this part: “the technology wasn’t good enough for such effects in 1969”
===========
Yes, it was. Take note of, for example, Star Trek the original series. I’m not a trekkie but I have dabbled into the world of Gene Roddenberry and the technology employed behind that TV show was nothing short of astounding. And that was several years before the moon launch. There were plenty of other TV shows and movies in that time frame that used technology that was good enough.
Remember, the video stage that was presented by NASA was constructed by Hollywood people that earn good money doing this stuff. There weren’t many people, maybe 30 or so, and they didn’t know they were working on a project for NASA.
Then there’s this part: If the computer says it’s so, it’s the word of God brought down the mountain and none may question.
============
I’ve been working with computers in one form or another in my work since 1979. I learned early on (Syntax error line 35098) that a simple typing error can cause a lot of problems. I’ve told people, “A computer is like the perfect employee because it has no brain. It can’t think, it can only do. So be VERY careful in what you tell it to do.”
Yes, they launched some rockets. That’s provable.
But after those rockets went out of view it all turned into faith.
There are things in the video that Tom linked that blows holes though the charade. Holes that nobody can explain.
How did they get through the Van Allen Radiation Belt and how was the flag rippling in the wind, on the moon? And on and on. The provable evidence AGAINST there ever being a man on the moon is gargantuan.
I’ll just leave it here. This could easily devolve into something I don’t wish for on this site.
Landing on the moon, July 20, 1969
I choose to believe.
…and the flag didn’t ripple.
DT, tell us more about your long time with the aerospace industry, please.
It was one of several industries I was involved with. I had a Travis McGee-style professional life.
and… 🙂
Here’s a jolly little tune for pondering our lunar journeys. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1D65NMBfmo
And ghost, whut is a CF? Curious Factfinder?
It starts with cluster.
That was my reaction to the gov’ts very amateurish method of pulling this moon hoax stuff. I was 14 yo in 1969 so I had quite a bit of naivete running through my veins. Plus, us kids didn’t have 24/7 access to the 3 channel TV, so we got our spoonfed mental manicuring in small doses.
The vid that you leaked is not the first time I have seen that info. I’ve known much of that stuff since the 90’s. And I’ve learned a lot more about this criminal gov’t since that time too. The gullibility of the american public cannot be overestimated.
Don’t know why I didn’t think of that. James Kunstler has dubbed his website that very name. I was 13 when the moon thang happened, and the subsequent landings, and I believed it all for about 30 years until I didn’t. I believed 9/11 for maybe two days. I didn’t believe the pandemic scam for one minute. How’s that old saying go?? “Fool me once shame on you… fool me 9,877 times then someone’s a fool or something like that….”
The “C” probably stands for “cluster”.