“The suspects have not been identified because of their age.“

This protection of violent “children” past puberty- call it 12 for those that want firm lines in the sand – needs to stop . The suspects in this case were 15 – old enough to commit felonies. Big difference between a 15yo and a 5yo. I can see not releasing juvenile names for “crimes” such as obtaining under-age beer but when said juvenile commits violent felonies, they are not juvenile anymore and the public should be aware of potential danger in their midst. And said juvenile should be treated as an adult in the court system.

Old enough to do the crime? FAFO.

Tolerance for the sake of tolerance is no virtue when tolerance ignores that which is being tolerated.