HomeUncategorizedTableaux
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ghostsniper
ghostsniper
3 days ago

It’s also clear now, that the NGO racket associated with all that is going to be dismantled — the money-stream from the likes of Soros & friends.

They are going to get RICOed, their assets could be seized, and the public will learn a whole lot more about the damage they have done to the country.

The Left’s NGOs not only support the on-the-ground street action, they also provide thousands of “executive” jobs and salaries to the Maoist nose-rings and transy-boys churned out of the higher ed diploma mills who are otherwise unemployable in any real economy with their race-and-gender studies diplomas.

More….

https://www.kunstler.com/p/the-democrats-last-rodeo

nuthatch
ghostsniper
ghostsniper
3 days ago

Renée Nicole Macklin Good was pronounced dead after being admitted to Hennepin County Medical Center for multiple gunshot wounds to her head.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Ren%C3%A9e_Good

Shouldn’t that say, “….gunshot wounds to THEIR head”?

fem
DT
DT
3 days ago
Reply to  ghostsniper

She chose to drive in front of a bullet. Someone needed to make the Salamis look smart. I’ve lost any sympathy for the enemy.

ghostsniper
ghostsniper
3 days ago
Reply to  DT

I was being facetious. The article stated “she”, but since she was genital forward in her approach to life, it seems like those type of people might also have pronoun preferences, thus my mention of the word “they”.

Yesterday I was reading about an art painting tutorial given by a person with the first name of Mot. The accompanying picture indicated Mot is a female in her early 20’s. Reading the write-up it kept referring to her as “they” and “their” and the write-up was lengthy so I tired of it quickly and moved on.

I looked at the picture again and realized that with make-up, hairstyle, and attire, Mot could indeed be a male in disguise.

Now, what this arrogant piece of shit was trying to require of me, and anyone else to read that blurb, was to alter my reality to more fit “their” fantasy. To “them” it is like a micro power trip, that “they” can, with very little effort on “their” part, control others. S/He must have chuckled openly when s/he read that the first time and approved it for publication.

I only read 2 or 3 sentences of a several paragraphs write-up and it was like reading continuous tongue twisters and distortions of reality.
Referring to a singular as a plural.

I looked it up, and disappointingly, the online dictionary approved of such a thing and referenced all the way back to Shakespeare doing it. (Who, BTW, according to Vox, has been proven to be fake.)

No, I did not follow up with that art tutorial, and I sent an email to the website that featured it, telling them their write-up was indicative of a poorly conducted tutorial and I won’t consider it.

Behavior has consequences.

Joe
Joe
3 days ago
Reply to  ghostsniper

How about “This, That and It”. Leave it at that and never forget this.